![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||
Advantage | Conf | National | Actual | Category | Actual | National | Conf |
Rank | Rank | Rank | Rank | ||||
![]() |
9 | 101 | 105.5 | Rushing Offense | 174 | 53 | 5 |
![]() |
12 | 95 | 187.5 | Passing Offense | 266 | 46 | 2 |
![]() |
10 | 109 | 293 | Total Offense | 440 | 50 | 3 |
![]() |
9 | 88 | 22.5 | Scoring Offense | 31 | 59 | 3 |
![]() |
6 | 66 | 139.5 | Rushing Defense | 216.50 | 99 | 9 |
![]() |
12 | 109 | 160.2 | Pass Efficiency Defense | 134.89 | 75 | 5 |
![]() |
6 | 62 | 382 | Total Defense | 403 | 73 | 5 |
![]() |
7 | 71 | 26 | Scoring Defense | 26 | 71 | 5 |
![]() |
2 | 13 | 41.75 | Net Punting | 34.15 | 93 | 7 |
![]() |
7 | 66 | 7.43 | Punt Returns | 9 | 55 | 4 |
![]() |
4 | 58 | 20.71 | Kickoff Returns | 21.9 | 51 | 7 |
![]() |
9 | 71 | -.5 | Turnover Margin | 2 | 8 | 1 |
![]() |
6 | 75 | 242.5 | Pass Defense | 186.5 | 34 | 3 |
![]() |
11 | 97 | 115.73 | Passing Efficiency | 141.88 | 51 | 4 |
![]() |
7 | 37 | 2.5 | Sacks | 3.5 | 14 | 1 |
![]() |
10 | 80 | 5 | Tackles For Loss | 8.5 | 20 | 1 |
![]() |
12 | 113 | 4 | Sacks Allowed | 2 | 65 | 6 |
Another week, another chart dominated by the opponent's logo. Starting to get a bit old, especially considering we haven't even gotten into the conference season yet.
Fresno State has played a FCS team and an Oregon team that leads to high-paced games with a lot of scoring, but the FSU offense is plenty talented and will be able to put up points on the Colorado defense.
Just go ahead and look at the total offense comparisons and then feel free to vomit. Again, this is after playing the murderers row of Colorado State and Sacramento State. Better hope a passing game somehow appears this week.
Colorado gets the edge in rushing defense largely due to the Bulldogs having taken on an Oregon team that puts up loads of rushing yards. At least the Buffaloes have the strong punting numbers to fall back on.