Report: Colorado Regents Meeting to Discuss Legality of Conference Switch From Big 12, Major Announcement Wednesday
The Boulder Daily Camera is reporting that the secret meeting called by the University of Colorado Regents in downtown Denver Tuesday night is to discuss the legality of switching from the Big 12 conference to what is believed to be the Pac-10.
Orangebloods.com, a Texas Longhorn site, also suggests that Colorado is expecting to have a major announcement Wednesday.
Colorado is expected to have a major announcement on Wednesday, sources said.
If the specualation is true, Colorado could be preparing to accept a bid from the Pac-10 Conference, which has targeted the Buffaloes for expansion.
The move would undercut an attempt by Baylor to sway the Texas Legislature into helping the Bears get an invite ahead of Colorado.
It would also guarantee that the Pac-10 probably pulls off at least one of its plans presented to league presidents and chancellors at meetings over the weekend in San Francisco.
One has to wonder if a similar announcement is coming from the Big Ten regarding Notre Dame, Nebraska and Missouri to coincide with a potential annoucement tomorrow from the University of Colorado.
What does this all mean? Who knows if orangebloods.com is correct but the fact that the CU regents are meeting with legal entities should signify something is coming down the pipeline. Colorado is on the June 15th deadline from the Big 12 like Nebraska and Missouri so the potential for a quick offer from the Pac-10 is certainly understandable. If Colorado did receive an offer, one has to wonder if that means the Pac-10 is moving towards the proposal of adding just Colorado and Utah, instead of six teams for the Big 12. This would be the ideal situation for the Colorado Buffaloes by splitting away from the Big 12 and subsequently avoiding being grouped together with the rumored Big 12 South and the Arizona teams of the Pac-10.
Multiple reports suggest Chip Brown of orangebloods.com on a Portland radio station said he believes Colorado has an offer from the Pac-10 and that they will be accepting the offer tomorrow.
Orangebloods does bring up the concern that if the Big 12 does stay intact and Colorado is the only school to leave for the Pac-10, could the University of Colorado afford the $10.0 million buyout it would have to pay back to the Big 12? It is a valid question but something tells me the threat of playing in the Mountain West Conference coupled with the excitement of being a part of the Pac-10 both from a athletic and academic perspective may excite the alumni donor base. Also, getting the $500,000 buyout due from Jeff Bzdelik after he left the basketball head coaching position for Wake Forest earlier this year would help!
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I want you Buffs in the Pac...
… but don’t go burning any bridges. I want that 16 team league more than I want a Pac12. There is no good way to structure a 12 team league in the Pac. I hope this is just a way to circumvent the Baylor problem.
Go Stanford!
This is pretty exciting stuff...
It just feels nice to be wanted. As a Bay Area resident and CU alum, I’m hopeful that we join the Pac 10. I would be more than willing to help cover some of the $10MM cost if we do in fact leave, and I’m hopeful many alum feel the same. That of course is limited to my current income level, which won’t make much of a dent unless I win the mega millions very soon.
If we are invited to the Pac 10 tomorrow my guess is that the Big 12 may look a lot different a couple of years from now and that collecting any fee may be difficult to do. I also think that ending up in the Mountain West is probably the death of our football program and unless the economy makes some serious improvement the next two years, or the next Bill Gates spends some time at CU, the school may follow down into the abyss.
In a perfect world we end up in the Pac-10 conference with a new lucrative revenue sharing deal and it frees up some room in the coffers and makes our football program relevant again within the next 5 years. I think academically we can all agree this is a no-brainer. CU is a much better academic institution than most of, if not all of the Big 12 and this should help the school receive more accolades and higher rankings.
Go Buffs!
NorCal CARDS FAN
Buckle up!
This could be a wild ride before it’s over.
As an NU fan, I should wish for nothing but ill will on your program. However, I really hope the speculation is true. It would put Colorado where they should’ve been 15 years ago, it would essentially give the green light for NU to jump $hip to the Big 10, and best of all; it would SCREW TEXAS! I love it!
Hang 'em!!!
by Screwface on Jun 8, 2010 6:15 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
Depending on how conference schedules work out
But I doubt it would be the year-ending game it’s been.
I do know that a few teams do play non-conference teams at the end of the season, so it is a possibility.
DAG
by DavidAGerhardt on Jun 8, 2010 6:34 PM MDT up reply actions
I do, too. My very first attended game was the 57 yard field goal against you guys 2 years ago in Lincoln. I loved the atmosphere. I’ve been to 4 games since then and nothing has come close to matching the buzz in the stadium during that game.
Hang 'em!!!
by Screwface on Jun 8, 2010 7:41 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
ugh i remember that well
it’ll be tough to maintain both the CSU and NU rivalries if we join the Pac-10. I have a feeling at least one will get dropped and it’ll probably be Nebraska. hopefully i am wrong.
Whatever happens...
I’m glad the Buffs are taking control of their future. CU does not need to be held hostage by Baylor.
Go Buffs.
Dime, I love your work over @ BON. I’m not a Longhorn hater, I hate the state of Texas.
I don’t think it’s fair that the Texas legislature is holding UT hostage with the “Tech” problem, the recent “Baylor” posturing, and the A & M issues during the SWC/BigXII change-over.
In your opinion, do you think UT would make a conference change if it wasn’t forced to? Better yet, do you think UT would be willing to give up “running” the BigXII for a little more money?
Hang 'em!!!
by Screwface on Jun 8, 2010 7:33 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
don't think there's an announcement
I think these decisions have to come after a public hearing. These closed door special meetings are really study sessions and when getting legal advice you can close them off to the public, they wouldn’t be able to legally vote on moving without it being public. I suppose the AD could annouce they’ve received an invite though. Wouldn’t be a committment though.

by 












