Colorado, Utah On the Move to the Pac 10? Updated 2/10
bumped to front page from fan posts - irish1611
According to ESPN the PAC-10 is considering expanding to 12 teams with Colorado and Utah at the top of the list:
Utah might be headed to the Pac-10. A report from ABC4 in Salt Lake City says Utah will be invited to the Pac-10 conference, while BYU was left out of the guest list.
But there's a long way to go before any of this happens. The Pac-10 has to first decide that they are expanding, like the Big Ten. Then they might invite two schools to their conference to allow for a conference championship and a better scheduling format. ABC4 speculates that Utah and Colorado might be the two additions.
The TV station adds: "The Pac-10 TV deal is about to expire, and a new TV partner would want the league to have a football championship game, which requires the league to have 12 teams."
Pac-10 commissioner Larry Scott told the San Jose Mercury News that he'll be "very cautious" with expansion. "It?s always tempting to go for short-term economic gain, but it?s very hard to go backwards. You run the risk of potentially harming something that is so special."
What are your thoughts on the possible move? Probably not the best from a prestige stand point but maybe we could be more competitive in that league. Plus we would have a natural rivalry (at least for now) with UCLA.
Update:
I talked to a former administrator who worked for Colorado in 1994 when the discussion last came up he brought up the major issues he remembers from the time were that the Pac- 10 wanted CU to add a number of non- revenue or expensive sports that they did not have such as swimming and baseball. I feel like this would be a major issue still although he said that whether or not it went down was completely dependent on who the regents are at the time of the offer.
All comments, FanPosts, and FanShots are the views of the reader-authors who create them.
0 recs |
79 comments
|
Comments
Based on the collective yawn from the CU fan base, I'm a little skeptical.
The average Ute would be ecstatic to move to the Pac-10, but if the Pac-10 expands, it’s going to invite two schools; Utah won’t be invited alone.
So we need someone to go with us. BYU is unlikely — they won’t play any sport on Sunday, and they are much too conservative for the Pac-10. Any other western school just doesn’t have the academics or the all-around sporting program to make the jump.
That leaves Utah hoping that Colorado would join us, but I’m just not feeling it from your fan base.
by Ute in DC on Feb 9, 2010 1:28 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
CU gets a lot of students from both Big 12 and Pac 10 areas
Personally, I think I’d rather see road games in Seattle, San Francisco, or Tucson, than Ames, Iowa, Manhattan, Kansas, or Lubbock, Texas. On the other hand, I don’t know how much I like the idea of leaving behind the tradition of playing against the old Big 8 teams. I guess we could still schedule non-conference games with NU and CSU, though.
by NoVABuff on Feb 9, 2010 1:45 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I'm for it.
We recruit a lot better in California than we do in Texas. Forget road trips to Nebraska. Let’s hit the coast.
by PeteDiddy on Feb 9, 2010 1:48 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
History vs. Best Fit
Is how I see it. Yes, our history is with OU, NE, KU. And, yes, I would be sad to see that go.
However, in attempting to be objective, I feel like CU’s culture is more attractive to H.S. students from Pac-10 country and therefore we should be able to recruit better athletes from these states. It’s tough to sell CU to guys from farms/small towns in Big XII land when they’re raised by typically conservative families. However, CU and Boulder’s “brand” is much more palatible on the Left Coast. And, the kids from Texas that want to come to CU will still come here, by and large.
As I see it, over the long-term, it’s a better fit for us. However, I wish we could jump after a few 8+ win seasons so the perception would not be we’re running to where we think we can win.
by BuffulanceMan on Feb 9, 2010 2:23 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
If you think the Pac-10 is an easier go than the Big 12, you're sadly mistaken
I know what the perception is, but the perception is total bunk.
I agree about Colorado and Boulder being a better Pac-10 fit culturally. And, the Denver market is key to Pac-10 expansion, whereas Utah is just along for the ride. If CU says no, there is no reason for this to happen.
--Dave
Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog
by Addicted to Quack on Feb 9, 2010 10:14 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Right now
the WAC would be a tough go for us. We were 3-9 last year and lost to CSU at home and Toledo on the road.
Historically, I’d say that the Big 12 is a better football conference than the Pac-10, meaning the teams in the Big 12 are typically better top-to-bottom than the teams in the Pac-10, top-to-bottom. However, that was not the case last year. MBB? Not so sure there.
Regardless, I was just stating what I think the perception would be, generally, nationally.
by BuffulanceMan on Feb 10, 2010 11:03 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Can we go now??!!
I don’t think anything would excite me more than CU moving to the PAC 10. It makes travel much easier for alums, as all pac 10 sites are located near major airports(Spokane excluded) and the destinations are far more attractive for travel. I know as an alum who lives in San Diego, this would allow me to attend games in Phoenix, Tucson, and both the LA schools every year, plus the occasional trips to san fran and the northwest. SIGN ME UP!!!
by buffsnbruins on Feb 9, 2010 2:44 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I need to find the stats but I assume our alumni base
would be much better aligned with the PAC 10 compared to Big 12 states. I would like the move personally, from a recruiting standpoint and an excitement standpoint. I am much more intrigued to travel to PAC 10 away games than Ames, Manhattan, Lawrence, Columbia and Lincoln.
The Ralphie Report - Covering the Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Feb 9, 2010 2:54 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I agreed
I hope it happens. Its not like we’re a quick drive to any Big 12 schools I want to visit either.
The Ralphie Report - University of Colorado Athletics
by Jon Woods on Feb 9, 2010 3:01 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Maybe I'm a little selfish
but I’d prefer to stay in the Big 12. Nothing against the PAC 10 (its my second choice), but it does seem like a step down in prestige if you ask me. Even though I might agree that Boulder is more in line with the Left Coast than the Mid West, it would still feel like a demotion.
Colorado will always recruit California well, but our only hope of ever breaking into the Texas talent will be gone if we leave the Big 12.
What would our incentive be to do this?
by BuffnBigD on Feb 9, 2010 3:02 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
recruiting in Texas
…about recruiting in Texas, it’s very possible in the pac-10 as the Oregon schools have signed several good recruits from there recently (see LaMichael James, Darron Thomas, Lache Seastrunk, the Rogers bros). I’m sure other schools recruit from there, obviously USC does.
by Jimmy94 on Feb 11, 2010 3:02 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t forget about Justin Forsett, the current Seattle Seahawks running back who Cal recruited out of Austin.
CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.
by BearStage on Feb 12, 2010 3:17 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Money, Money, Money.
Lots of things to think about here. What does the TV contract look like in the Pac 10 vs the Big 12? The Pac 10 probably has a bigger TV market because of population considerations but what about relevance?
What type of revenue does the Pac 10 generate compared to the Big 12?
What type of agreements does the Big 12 have with Bowl Game hosts and what do they pay out compared to Big 12.
I’m sure our athletic department is way ahead of us on this and has more numbers at their disposal to crunch.
From a fan standpoint if you want to be the best you should play with the best. Any chance of becoming #1 is going to be a lot easier in the Big 12 where you have a chance to play a Texas, Nebraska, OU, and now Kansas ever year. Add that to the ability to vie for a Big 12 championship every year. Moving to the Pac 10 just does not give you those opportunities. Seems like we would be lowering the bar.
If you want to improve recruiting lets work on facilities, and the lame asst. coaching rules in Colorado.
Shoulder to Shoulder!
by Gruff Buff on Feb 9, 2010 3:15 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Becoming #1?
You mean like becoming #1 in the polls? How is that going to be easier in the big 12? First of all, to be #1 you have to win all your games. I think the Buffs will find that plenty difficult in the pac 10, which I think top to bottom is at least equal to the big 12. You may have a better 1-2 punch in Texas and OU, but after that the edge could go to either conference on any given year. And about recruiting in Texas, it’s very possible in the pac-10 as the Oregon schools have signed several good recruits from there recently (see LaMichael James, Darron Thomas, Lache Seastrunk, the Rogers bros). I’m sure other schools recruit from there, obviously USC does. With the addition of Utah and Co, there will be a pac-10 championship to vie for every year, which will be just as competitive as the big-12 title (maybe more, considering the domination of the South in recent years).
My main point is, if you’re a good team you’ll get a “chance to be #1” in either conference. Oregon should start in the top five of the polls to start the year, and they’ll indeed have a chance to be #1.
Trust me, you’re not lowering the bar by moving to the pac 10, a pac 10 championship is VERY tough to come by.
by Jimmy94 on Feb 11, 2010 2:58 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I love the idea
I really think that CU would fit better in the Pac-Ten than the Big XII from a cultural and academic standpoint. My main concern is that CU has the bare minimum of teams whereas most of the Cali schools have what seems like 40 sports. Water polo? We don’t even have baseball.
It also would be tough to lose the annual games against NE, Kansas, Mizzou, etc.
Need more details
by CleBUFFS on Feb 9, 2010 3:52 PM MST via mobile reply actions 0 recs
Can we do this like today?
I literally see no negatives in joining the pac10.
"It's like an owl without a graduation cap; Heartbreaking!!" -Tracy Jordan
by 303buff on Feb 9, 2010 3:59 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I would be all for it.
But it will all come down to what conference could make the University the most money. I really don’t have a clue who that would be.
by lakebuff on Feb 9, 2010 4:17 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
A change would do CU so much good
That would be a nice catalyst to stop sucking…..
Going to away games would be so much more appealing….
CU is already playing at Cal is Sept…. so sweet
by DABUFFS50 on Feb 9, 2010 4:50 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Why not?
I really think that CU would fit better in the Pac-Ten than the Big XII, it could definitely help with recruiting.
Sounds like a lot of upsides. Who wants to travel to some of the Big XII states for games?
by jateam1 on Feb 9, 2010 5:18 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Best of all
We would get at least a chance at revenge on old Rick at least ever other year.
by GTlions on Feb 9, 2010 5:18 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Gruff Buff is right
There needs to be an in depth analysis because it would be a change with long-term, intense repercussions. I’m “open” to the idea, enough to vote yes and was surprised to see the high level of support for the idea. CU has always played Pac 10 teams starting with the multi-year rivalry with UWashington in the early 1990s and this decade we have played series against ASU and USC with Cal coming up. CU is working hard to further improve its academic reputation as well and become the “Berkeley of the Rockies.” Why not become athletic and academic rivals of Cal, UCLA, and Stanford? UDub and USC are very solid universities as well. In the Big 12 it’s us, Texas and A&M. The rest of the schools are on part with SEC (excluding Vanderbilt). I agree that it would be better for alumni and recruiting in the long run and I don’t consider the old Big 8 rivalries to be very sacred in the modern game, excluding Nebraska. Perhaps we schedule a yearly traditional/regional battle with Nebraska on par with Notre Dame vs. Michigan, Florida vs. Florida St., Clemson vs. S.Carolina to preserve a tie to the Big 12.
by BuffFiend87 on Feb 9, 2010 8:57 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Hope CU winds up joining.
There are lots of good reasons to join the Pac 10.
For one thing, there would be a Pac 12 championship game.
You’d have an avenue to recruit kids from SoCal, which is loaded with talent.
If you are worried that you wouldn’t have a chance to be #1, just run the table against the Pac 12, including beating Oregon and USC. That’ll do just fine. Pardon me for saying so, but I think the rational CU fan is several steps away from entertaining that kind of delusion. However, CU would be totally competitive in the Pac 10 in football. Right now, I bet CU could beat ASU and WSU at the very least, and probably beat AZ or UCLA as well.
And seriously. Do your roadies in LA, Tempe, San Francisco, and Seattle instead of Iowa and Oklahoma. That alone should be enough of a reason. I know some of you are sold on this one.
Most importantly is the $$$ deal, which is yet to be determined. The commissioners are experts at negotiating such deals, unlike their fossilized predecessor, so you can be optimistic on that front.
ps Bear fan here. Hope you have a fun time visiting Berkeley next year!
by ginfizzbear on Feb 9, 2010 9:14 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Can't wait for that trip
The Ralphie Report - University of Colorado Athletics
by Jon Woods on Feb 10, 2010 7:41 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
will u please bring your buffalo? So badass.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
by carp on Feb 11, 2010 1:18 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Initial reaction: disgust
After thinking about it for 5 seconds: GREAT IDEA!! Our big rivalry against Nebraska is nice, but I think we could develop some biggers ones in the Pac 12; and play in better cities! It’s time for change.
"CarGo had to make some repairs to it. They called it a kitchen accident, but he was performing surgery. On teh lazor."
Hollidayrain Music
3OH!3 Remix Project!
by Hollidayrain on Feb 9, 2010 9:26 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Yes, Berkeley has its merits to visit
along with every other PAC10 school compared to the Big 12. Ames, Lawrence, Manhattan, Lubbock, Stillwater, Norman, College Station, Lincoln are utterly revolting compared to Boulder. Berkeley’s stadium reminds me of Folsom Field and every other Pac 10 city sounds awesome other than maybe Pullman.
by BuffFiend87 on Feb 9, 2010 9:51 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Fund raising
Gets a whole lot easier if we’re in the Pac 12. California sends a ton of students to CU every year and most move back when they’re done. I live in SF and would be much more willing to make sizable donations if I was getting to see my Buffs every year in Berkeley, LA or Palo Alto.
Go Buffs!
by BuffsCrock on Feb 9, 2010 11:51 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
great point about fundraising...
The Ralphie Report - Covering the Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Feb 10, 2010 11:20 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
all things being equal I'd rather stay in the Big 12
but it sounds like there is gonna be a huge chain reaction of moves pretty soon. If Mizzou goes to the Big 10 and the Big 12 has to scramble for someone like TCU (and then realign the divisions) we may as well leave. CU and Utah would be a good fit in the Pac-10, I won’t deny that.
I’d hate to not play NU anymore. I’m sure we would offer to play them home and home every year but I bet NU would take pleasure in telling us “you’re not our rival, we don’t give a crap if we play you or not, our fans get mistreated in Boulder and we can sell out our stadium for Southern Alabama Secretarial College so why would we play you?”
by nebraskasux on Feb 10, 2010 5:11 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
True
However, they’ll miss us when we’re gone and they can no longer hold 3 wins every 4 years over our heads. Then what will all those Nebraskans that choose to not live the “good life” in NE, but live in the great state of CO, do? They’ll just have to listen to us tell them how much their state sucks and that’s why they live here.
by BuffulanceMan on Feb 10, 2010 11:10 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
This would hurt
I have been a Buffs fan for 12 seasons now, ever since I was a 10 year old kid, born and raised in Nebraska. I still have close family in the Omaha area, all die-hard Husker fans. 62-36 was one of the most ecstatic days in my life. I hate how our rivalries have died because we have started to lose more than we win. I understand that the Pac-10 sounds more intriguing right now, but to erase the history we have with the Big XII would be so jolting, I’d be in unfamiliar territory with a move to the West. I am a Midwest kid at heart, a Buffs fan till death, and if we do move to the Pac-10 that’s not going to change obviously, but damn, would it be tough on me if we leave the Big XII.
All that being said, whatever’s best for us, let it happen.
by Nathanael on Feb 10, 2010 6:08 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Good article that I saw linked elsewhere:
http://www.laobserved.com/intell/2010/02/weighing_pac-10_expansion.php
Looks like we’re in the drivers seat, I guess it feels good to wanted by someone! Bringing NU along would be sweet but I doubt that would happen.
by nebraskasux on Feb 10, 2010 7:52 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the link
Looks like it’s all on us now…
"CarGo had to make some repairs to it. They called it a kitchen accident, but he was performing surgery. On teh lazor."
Hollidayrain Music
3OH!3 Remix Project!
by Hollidayrain on Feb 10, 2010 10:44 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
It would be hard for me to imagine Nebraska in the PAC 10.
The author is right, the natural choices are Colorado and Utah. How about these divisions:
PAC 10 SOUTH
Colorado
Utah
UCLA
USC
Arizona
Arizona State
PAC 10 NORTH
Washington
Washington State
Stanford
Cal
Oregon
Oregon State
Colorado and Utah could easily be split with Stanford and Cal.
The Ralphie Report - Covering the Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Feb 10, 2010 11:27 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it would look a lot better this way
North
Utah
Colorado
Oregon
Oregon State
Washington
Washington State
South
Cal
Stanford
USC
UCLA
Arizona
Arizona State
The Ralphie Report - University of Colorado Athletics
by Jon Woods on Feb 10, 2010 12:28 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
nope
I want USC in Boulder every other year!
The Ralphie Report - Covering the Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Feb 10, 2010 1:55 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Plus, I want to be playing in So California for recruiting purposes every year
The Ralphie Report - Covering the Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Feb 10, 2010 1:56 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but that’s the way it’d be. The California schools will want to play each other every year. The Oregon/Washington schools will want to play each other every year.
That leaves Arizona, ASU, CU, and Utah to grab ahold of each division. And the natural pairings for Utah and CU are with the northern schools.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Feb 10, 2010 2:23 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
It wouldnt take long at all...
To form a nice little rivalry with your Ducks.
The Ralphie Report - University of Colorado Athletics
by Jon Woods on Feb 10, 2010 2:28 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
You guys already hate us for stealing all your recruits. So it’d come so naturally.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Feb 10, 2010 2:35 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
very true
I wouldn’t call it stealing…more like “smart recruits”
The Ralphie Report - Covering the Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Feb 10, 2010 3:11 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Yea but we dont have Phil Knight and nike to donate 135million plus 14 different jerseys a year.
by THEMFTRUTH34 on Feb 10, 2010 10:07 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
The California schools will want to play each other every year.
Oh hell yes. We would scream bloody freakin’ murder if we all didn’t play each other every year. The one thing i don’t like about the “12-Pack” idea is the divisions. I will definitely getting to play every team every year. Even before we had the round-robin, we only missed 1 school a year. With these divisions, we’d have 3 schools from the other division that we’d miss each season, right? I suppose playing Utah and Colorado would be new challenges, but missing Oregon puts a cramp in my style.
CGB: Wasting Your Potential, Your Time, & Your Life Since 2006.
by BearStage on Feb 12, 2010 3:29 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah. Not playing Cal almost feels like we’d be getting a divorce. But you can continue to be UO Berkeley/AtQ South!
its spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-N-O-B-A-L-L-S"
by JShufelt on Feb 12, 2010 9:24 AM MST up reply actions 0 recs
a reason why this might not work, is because no Pac10 school wants to be out of USC’s division (for similar reasons you’ve cited).
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
by carp on Feb 11, 2010 1:14 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
It would probably be better to avoid doing it geographically, as the NW schools would never agree to expansion if it meant they would be missing a bunch of California trips. It would be better to do it ACC style and split the current rivalry pairs:
Division A
Arizona
USC
Cal
Oregon State
Washington State
Utah
Division B
Arizona State
UCLA
Stanford
Oregon
Washington
Utah
Play the 5 divisional opponents, your natural rival from the other division, and 2 more on a rotating basis. Probably need to shuffle them around a bit to make them as balanced as possible. The only other thing I can think of is that all 4 California schools may demand that they always play eachother.
by GBB4188 on Feb 14, 2010 7:18 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Bruins Nation has a nice writeup on the subject
They like the natural instate rivalries that the PAC 10 currently has and many believe either CU and CSU/Air Force or Utah and BYU. The big issue their is BYU won’t play games on Sunday.
http://www.bruinsnation.com/2010/2/10/1304015/expanding-to-pac-12-not-too
The Ralphie Report - Covering the Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Feb 10, 2010 11:35 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
I really don’t think the Pac-10 is gonna care about natural rivals this time around. It’s about TV markets, and getting Colorado/Denver is really what will make this all go.
As Dave on ATQ put it, the balls in CU’s court.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Feb 10, 2010 2:27 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree with my colleague from CGB North.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
by carp on Feb 11, 2010 1:13 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I like the idea...
…mostly because I’m from northern California and went to CU. I have piles of friends and high school acquaintances who attended PAC-10 schools. I would be MUCH more inclined to travel to Cali than Texas. I think the comments about CU being a better fit in the PAC-10 are right on target. I would be reluctant to leave some Big-12 rivalries behind and the virtually yearly chance to play a top 5 ranked team is nice as well, but I would look forward to a new conference that is a better fit overall for CU.
by NPCannon on Feb 10, 2010 12:35 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Biggest Hurtle
I talked to a former administrator who worked for Colorado in 1994 when the discussion last came up he brought up the major issues he remembers from the time were that the Pac- 10 wanted CU to add a number of non- revenue or expensive sports that they did not have such as swimming and baseball. I feel like this would be a major issue still although he said that whether or not it went down was completely dependent on who the regents are at the time of the offer.
by GTlions on Feb 10, 2010 2:39 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
interesting....
Oregon doesn’t have swimming. Didn’t have baseball until last year (and that wasn’t anything the Pac-10 compelled us to do).
I can tell you right now. This move is going to be all about football, and all about money. I highly doubt the Pac-10 will care about CU adding additional sports.
--Dave
Addicted to Quack, SBN's Oregon Ducks blog
by Addicted to Quack on Feb 10, 2010 3:32 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
With Scott in charge, it seems like the Pac-10 will be willing to move past these arguments that may have held up expansion in the past. College football is king, and that will drive this.
--AddictedToQuack, SBNation's Oregon Ducks blog
by jtlight on Feb 10, 2010 5:00 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
pfft
Hey now, we barely even have a football team right now and that doesn’t seem to be stopping us from consideration! :P
Personally I’d like to see Baseball at CU or Swimming, I mean we are a major university why shouldn’t we have it? i’ll stop at Rowing though.
by Ever on Feb 10, 2010 5:24 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Denver Market???????
Why would they consider the “Denver market” that great, I mean we can’t even count on the “Denver market” to fill the stadium on home games as it is now
by jwe1747 on Feb 10, 2010 5:08 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Yeah Denver Market
Denver and Salt Lake are realistically the two largest and really only major markets in the Mountain time zone and by getting Colorado and Utah the Pac-10 would be able to play some games earlier and potentially remove some of the perception that the east coast doesn’t care about the west coast.
by GTlions on Feb 10, 2010 5:48 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I think they mean the Denver Media Market.
Things like Television. Think of if instead of Nebraska vs. Missouri as the Night game in our region they would have USC vs CAL. They are looking for monetary gain in terms of TV Ratings.
"No Rebounds, No Rings"
by ksballa11 on Feb 10, 2010 8:24 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I was going to ask about that as well.
Specifically, would adding CU give the Denver area any more reason to watch PAC-1x sports than it has now? I’ve been away from the Rockies for a while, but the last I remember, Denver didn’t have all that avid of an interest in CU sports. Football was big in Denver in the early 90s, but that was about it.
And it’s really more of a long-term question than a short-term one. Suppose that Colorado was playing at an upper PAC-10 level. Say, something along the lines of last year’s Stanford. How much would Denver care? And how much would Denver care about the other PAC-10 schools? And is the PAC-10 fairly evaluating that?
That said, this could be a perception issue. Nationally, it’s very easy to associate the Denver market with CU (whether it’s true in reality or not). If the PAC-10 did expand and pick up the perception of holding the Denver market, it could really benefit them with commercial revenues and with negotiations with the networks and ESPN for national broadcasting.
by Hooper on Feb 10, 2010 10:08 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
I think its more of the fact that they would have the game on.
If the ABC (or whoever) game on saturday night is a PAC-10 game vs. a Big 12 people will watch. When the only option you have is a PAC-10 game the ad revenue goes there way.
But you’re right, while I think CU is the “biggest” College team in Denver, I don’t think the market is polarized around them.
"No Rebounds, No Rings"
by ksballa11 on Feb 10, 2010 11:12 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
sign me up!
I think it’s a great idea and completely agree with those thoughts that we fit better with those programs culturally speaking perhaps even academically.
I understand the historical argument against joining but I am having problems understanding the relevancy argument. Finishing in last place in the Big 12 does not make us any more relevant than last place in the Pac-10.
I’ll be honest, I left my road trip days to Lawrence and Norman behind when i graduated college. It would be nice to be able fly out to these PAC-10 locations. It’s wayyyy easier to convince the significant other of a trip to Cali or Wash than it is to convince them of a good-old fashioned Roadie to Lincoln!!!! No offense to any Iowans but Ames is hardly a vacation destination.
My recollection of college was there were always a large percentage of left coast people at CU, far more proportionately than I would see from any Big 12 states. I mean come on, you can’t be from Nebraska and go to school at CU, I think they take away your overalls or one of your last remaining teeth for that :) So i would imagine we’d have a much stronger alumni presence at these other schools.
by Ever on Feb 10, 2010 5:22 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Best quote ever, I'm putting it in my sig, lol
“I mean come on, you can’t be from Nebraska and go to school at CU, I think they take away your overalls or one of your last remaining teeth for that”
"CarGo had to make some repairs to it. They called it a kitchen accident, but he was performing surgery. On teh lazor."
Hollidayrain Music
3OH!3 Remix Project!
by Hollidayrain on Feb 10, 2010 9:01 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Texas and Oklahoma
i think that thier are much more Texas, Oklahoma and Nebraska fanis in Colorado much of them actually buy season tickets to CU and bring out their original team stuff once a year when they play their respective teams. As much as we dont like them they fill the stadium and fill the athletic budget.
by THEMFTRUTH34 on Feb 10, 2010 10:14 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
If that's so, would PAC-10 schools' fans do the same?
Or would a conference transfer become a budget problem?
by Hooper on Feb 10, 2010 10:44 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Gotta say I hate the idea...
but then again I love the bowl system too…
I also don’t equate the Pac-10 anywhere close to the Big 12 on the prestige scale.
"Fans like home runs. And we have assembled a pitching staff to please our fans."
Clark Griffith - Washington Senators owner
by RockyNuggets on Feb 10, 2010 11:20 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
I also don’t equate the Pac-10 anywhere close to the Big 12 on the prestige scale.
I wouldn’t either, but that’s not the issue at all. We’re talking about an expanded Pac10 (12-Pac has been thrown around the Internetz) which would bring two new top-35 media markets, an additional OOC game (8 league, 4 OOC games), a conference championship game, a new league rivalry (Utah-CU), 2-3 sexy OOC rivalries (Utah-BYU; CU-CSU; CU-Nebraska), the chance of attaining two BCS bowl births, and a revamped bowl schedule which includes the new Alamo Bowl and a revised Sun Bowl. I haven’t even mentioned a new TV contract or network which would certainly be a major impetus for expansion. In short, compare this futuristic Pac12 to the current Big12 and see how you like it.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
by carp on Feb 11, 2010 1:25 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
Does anyone know what it would take for CU to leave the Big 12
Is there a penalty we would have to pay?
Do we have a contract or anything legally binding us to stay?
"No Rebounds, No Rings"
by ksballa11 on Feb 10, 2010 11:21 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
This Cal fan would be honored to see CU & Utah join an expanded Pac10 and have a new TV network.
"We lose to Stanford in many sports, but if you want to make a Cal team quit, bring a weapon."
--Coach Clark
by carp on Feb 11, 2010 1:06 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Oddly enough I’ve always considered the Pac-10 the most prestigious conference to be in. Maybe not football specifically but all round it seemed like the coolest conference.
by MarkBuff on Feb 11, 2010 2:02 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Geesh… Have you guys made a decision yet?!
The thing I like a lot is, you would already be one leg up on Stanford. They don’t have an SBNation blog (Or really, any blog to speak of).
its spelled "S-H-U-F-E-L-T-N-O-B-A-L-L-S"
by JShufelt on Feb 11, 2010 4:17 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
C'mon over!
Denver media market yadda yadda.
As a Stanford fan speaking with other Pac-10 fans I know, we’d love to have the Buffs join the Pac-10 if it comes to expansion, culturally and academically you guys are a great fit, you hippies. If you don’t have baseball or swimming, no biggie our baseball/swimming/softball/cross country/etc. teams plays rando’s all the time (Cal State Sacremento? Really?). Wouldn’t even mind Colorado State to maintain the in-state rivalries thing.
Utah, ok whatever, fine if CU joins to make it a nice even number.
BYU scares us & most of the Pac-10. I think we scare them too. Last time the Stanford band went to BYU, it didn’t go over so well from their perspective. Band Skit: “Marriage is between a man and a woman…and a woman…and a woman…and a woman…and a woman.”
Anyhow, hope it works out.
by CardinalRules07 on Feb 11, 2010 8:10 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
Seriously?
I think its funny that some people want UC to go to the Pac 10 so they can be competitive. This is the BIG 12 BROTHER! Besides, I love to hate you guys. I don’t need the separation anxiety
by husker_ on Feb 11, 2010 11:06 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
UC?
Um – UCs are located in California. We’re CU, buster.
by BuffulanceMan on Feb 12, 2010 2:06 PM MST up reply actions 0 recs
First post!.......and this is a great idea
Love the idea! Boulder and CU have much more in common on numerous fronts with left coast than we do with the other schools in the XII. Christ Baylor is a couple decades fresh from allowing dancing! It would also be nice to have a network we are part of so we could actually see our away games. (If we ever win one)
by fluffybuff on Feb 12, 2010 1:02 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Modernizing CU?
If we assume that (american) universities are or have become private enterprises and need to operate like a business, it is obviously in CU’s best interest to associate itself (academically and athletically) with places like Stanford, Cal Berkely, and the University of Washington; and set it sights on the distant future – and not towards the backwaters of aimes, lubbuck, stillwater, waco, college station, and yes, you too: lincoln, you metropolis of hay markets ;) The University of Colorado needs to do a little rebranding – as they say in the advertising world. A new CU era, a new gaze to the west, and yes, a new leadership, would certainly do wonders for CU as an institution in general. CU has obviously chosen to step up its academic standards, and if it wishes to be taken seriously – which is certainly isn’t among the snobs of east coast elite – it needs to compete not with the football dogmatism of TEXAS and OKLAHOMA.
Instead of suffering from disillionment each year (b/w mass slaughter from Big XII war machines, or upsets from montana states), the buffs need a better plan of attack. No doubt, the Buffs can be very competitive in a new kind of future, and even great!! CU can’t compete with one-dimensional places like norman, oklahoma; and it’s flat out embarrassing to eek out 1 point wins in aimes. If we’re going to throw around that annoying word “competitive”… Boulder/Denver should innovate and compete. Not with Lawence, but with places like Eugene, Seattle, Santa Monica/Los Angeles, and my home, the Berkeley/Bay Area.
- An angy, and loyal fan.
by phegevista on Feb 12, 2010 6:56 AM MST reply actions 0 recs
Let's GO
I’d love to see the Buffs move to the Pac 10, as would everybody else associated with CU. The only ones that want us to stay in the Big XII are the other teams in the North Division, as they have been nearly guaranteed a win with CU on the schedule ever since the Bohn-Hawkins era began.
This grand institution badly needs a change of scenery and an opportunity to hit the RESET button. Fire Bohn first, Hawkins next, hire somebody that will build a winner and generate donation $$$, and get on with your exciting new life in the Pac 10. Just the thought of it makes me happy!!!!
by VegasBuff on Feb 14, 2010 5:34 PM MST reply actions 0 recs
There is NO WAY I would want CU to move to the Pac10
If we want to go drive around in hybrids, drinking wine and sniffing our own farts, fine, move to the Pac10.
There is absolutly no way I would want to move from a Powerhouse conference as in the Big 12, and go to a slightly above mid-major Pac10. Most of the talent we get in recruting is from guys who want to play for a Big 12 school, then put us into the Pac10, then who are we going to get? thats right, we get Pac10 talent. This would be a absolutly stupid move for CU.
I do agree that CU as a school is not that simular to the other Big 12 schools, but that is a good thing, not a bad thing. CU’s below average recruiting is attributed to us getting over major scandles, not because we are in the wrong conference. With the scandles we have had, we are going to be recruiting at this level of just about any conference. If we were in the Big Sky conference, guess what we would likely again be at the bottom of that conference, why would an athelete go to CU with all its baggage if you could go to Northern Colorado without the baggage? Both schools are going to get you the same exposure.
If CU has any intention of being a top school in the NATION a move the the Pac10 would be the worst thing we can do.
by GoBuffs! on Mar 5, 2010 8:20 AM MST reply actions 0 recs

by 









