Special Teams, Road Woes Continue for the Colorado Buffaloes
There have been a few constants over the last three years - the Buffs will always lose on the road, the Buffs probably have the worst special teams play in the nation and at the most inopportune times, CU will commit a penalty. Most of the time, one of those will be the headline as to why Colorado lost.
It was no different for Missouri, who is one team all Buff fans won't mind leaving in the dust when the move to the Pac-10 becomes official in 2011. Colorado has been outscored 138-19 at HALFTIME the last five years, 86 - 3 over the last three years...at HALFTIME. I think most would admit this was the Missouri team to beat when you look back over the past five years but regardless of who Colorado plays on the road, the same issues prohibit them from winning.
A few observations after the jump...
Dan Hawkins sure has a quick trigger pull for the quarterback position. I wonder why the same quick trigger doesn't apply to his coaching staff? That would certainly make more sense if it was consistent across all of Coach's workings. But for some reason, nothing has changed in regards to special teams. Missouri led off the game with a big kick return that put the Buffs defense against the wall that resulted in pinning the Buffs offense inside the 5 yard line the first two possessions of the game that led to a safety that put the Buffs behind and gave the momentum to Missouri. A nice run on sentence there but special teams has a causal effect, almost always a negative causal effect for the Buffs. As CU fans, we always get to appreciate just how important special teams are when the opposition uses it to beat Colorado. We get a first hand view every game just how important kicking, punting and returning are to the game of football.
Want some more causal special teams events. K Aric Goodman, who has now made 16 of 36 field goals in his career and 1-4 this year, missed again wide left. Missouri then went on to score a touchdown on the next possession after converting a 4th and 5 on a fake punt, another special teams blunder. Next, CU brings in true freshman Justin Castor to kick a field goal. That one gets blocked and then Missouri scores a touchdown on the very next possession. Make those two field goals, might be a different ball game. Instead, 16 points for Missouri.
As for the quarterback change, it certainly surprised me to say the least. QB Tyler Hansen has been tampered with over the last three years at Colorado, losing precious eligibility while playing the musical chair game at quarterback. Last week, Hansen played one of the better games at quarterback that I could remember in the Dan Hawkins era. He was effective on the ground, made big plays on third down and led the Buffs to a win against the Georgia Bulldogs. It was certainly the best game of Hansen's career. One game later, Hansen is pulled. Hawkins said he wanted to get something going. Nothing got going except another situation where Hansen is now looking over his shoulder and the team is put in another awkward situation having to answer questions about who should be the starting quarterback.
If you had to attribute last week's win against Georgia to something on offense, what would it have been? You would probably say the ability to run the ball with both Rodney Stewart and Tyler Hansen. They tried with Rodney Stewart but once again on the road, Colorado refused to move Hansen out of the pocket and allow him to make plays with his feet. The reason Tyler Hansen is the quarterback over Cody Hawkins is his ability to make the defense have to account for him. Sometimes Colorado realizes that, sometimes they don't. Last night, the game plan didn't feature one of their playmakers.
Staying on the playmaking ability. Colorado doesn't have that bona fide playmaker or the Buffs refuse to use potential playmakers. They don't have an Alshon Jeffrey, A.J. Green, Taylor Martinez...somebody who can flip the field, turn momentum or just get his team out of trouble. When you are on the road, that is an important weapon to have. What we have at Colorado on the road is an offense that operates in a five yard box afraid to take risks, afraid to spread the field and ultimately allowing the opposition's defense to tee up on the quarterback and line of scrimmage. Toney Clemons has shown against Hawaii and returning kickoffs Saturday night that he can make plays. You have to take some chances deep with him on offense, you have to get the other squad's defense to loosen up.
Defense was, once again, solid and once again, was negatively impacted by special teams and the offense. Missouri came into the game averaging 432 yards a game, Colorado held them to a season low 345 yards. The Buffs forced two turnovers which the offense failed to capitalize on. They pressured, sacked and hurt Blaine Gabbert. Held Missouri to 3.7 yards per rush. 16 of the 26 points given up could be tied to poor special teams play.
I thought LB Josh Hartigan and DE Chidera Uzo-Diribe showed some great ability to get to the quarterback. LB Jon Major was all over the field.
Colorado's defense is going to struggle this year against strong slot receivers given crucial injuries to Parker Orms and Tyler Sandersfield.
8 Penalties, 66 yards. Last week, 3 penalties and a win. 8 penalties and you lose. Ticky tack penalties like false starts and delay of games continue to stop drives. Penalties are a game changer. Take last night for example. Buffs down 19-0 at half but they get the ball first coming out of intermission. Score a touchdown there, Colorado is right back in it. The defense is playing well, Colorado should have had at least six points after two missed field goals, you start to have hope if CU scores.
Colorado drives down the field to the Missouri 37 yard line after a few nice completions by Tyler Hansen. Its 2nd and 2. False start penalty, delay of game penalty back to back. Now 2nd and 12, drive over. Chance for a comeback over.
Final words - Last week brought hope, this week brought us back to reality that the Buffs are guaranteed 5 or 6 losses each year due to their troubles on the road. That leaves little room for error just to make a bowl game and no room to try and turn the corner as a program.
25 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
whats the best we can do now after watching this?
nothing has changed. we are not going to win on the road even against a horrible kansas team. i’m thinking we are going to go either 6-6 or 5-7 for the season so hawk has to be gone after this year right?……right?!?! i mean our goal this season is a winning season and a good bowl win.
if the pac12 is going to float us on lost revenue from leaving the big12 then does that mean our game against ohio state (imagine that away game next year if hawk is still here) next year give us the money to be able to fire hawk? on top of that i hear a lot about TARP and how that affects our contracts with assistant coaches, is there anyway to get around this? how much is really TARP affecting us from becoming who we once were?
I'm guessing that you mean TABOR
since CU football has nothing to do with buying bad mortgages. And it’s a very big deal.
I make reckless conclusions based on subjective data. (co-opted from Ash)
by Phil Fraser on Oct 10, 2010 10:03 AM MDT up reply actions
TABOR limits the # of multi year contracts we can offer to state employees
It’s something like 5, which usually go to the head fotball coach, head men’s and women’s basketball coach, head volleyball coach, and the president or something. Every other school we compete against can give 2 year contracts to position coaches
I make reckless conclusions based on subjective data. (co-opted from Ash)
by Phil Fraser on Oct 10, 2010 10:09 AM MDT up reply actions
i can understand the spirit of it but
it seems like the opposite affect of what TABOR ppl were hoping for….micromanaging the athletic program from the state level. if anything is to be successful there needs to be flexibility and TABOR seems to have us locked in. so theres no way around this other than a amendment to CO constitution? also since it came into being in 92 then why didn’t these problems emerge till hawk came in? was it because of the strength of the program and now that its been run into the ground no one wants to touch it with a 40ft pole?
One, TABOR has been rolled back repeatedly when people see the actual implications
Hopefully that continues.
2, These problems have been ongoing. Our team is not in the same place it was in 1990, or 1995. We have different mandates, and different obligations to the state, and to the school. Our 1990 championship team would not gain acceptance to the university now. As far as I recall, both Bienemy and Hagan were Prop 48 qualifiers, which are no longer allowed. And if our discipline panel like getting their hands on Sipili and Katoa, they would have LOVED Eric Bienemy.
This is not that team, and this is not that time. We won with recruits from SoCal, Texas, and Louisiana. You know who was mediocre then? USC, Texas, and LSU. Things have changed. And we’re still pining for the old days.
I make reckless conclusions based on subjective data. (co-opted from Ash)
by Phil Fraser on Oct 10, 2010 10:29 AM MDT up reply actions
mizzou
frustrating how everyone talks about how we’ll be happy we don’t have to see missouri anymore. Doesn’t anyone remember? Before Hawk got here we used to always beat Missouri
no we didn't
I make reckless conclusions based on subjective data. (co-opted from Ash)
by Phil Fraser on Oct 10, 2010 10:07 AM MDT up reply actions
yes we did
going back to 1995 in the 11 missouri games before hawkins we won 8 of them
that's not enough history
I make reckless conclusions based on subjective data. (co-opted from Ash)
by Phil Fraser on Oct 10, 2010 10:29 AM MDT up reply actions
is this the nail in hawkins coffin?
i would think it would have to be, right? RIGHT? I mean how much of this can be blamed on the coaches? Poor discipline, penalties, horrendous special teams play, bad play calling, QB by committee, no heart, can’t win road games. I could go on. I’m not surprised by the result at all, but its just disgusting to the see the same old same old. Fire Hawkins and promote the defensive coordinator. That could at least spark this team into a bowl game.
I agree with you post-mortem...
Just as in the CAL game, too many unforced penalties (some penalties are forced, such as when an o-lineman holds because he got beat, ect) will keep any team from winning.
Again, just as in the CAL game, the CU offense put the CU defense against the wall early and often. If there’s a silver lining in the season so far, it’s the solid play of our defense which has been put in too many bad situations.
Also, I agree that, instead of benching Hansen, the Buffs should have called more plays where he’s rolling out of the pocket or running the option. He’s most dangerous when he has the option of running down the field. DOn’t play Hansen like a pure pocket passer because he’s not.
As for our special teams play, it’s easy to see that CU is among the worst in the nation. One bright spot is Clemons’ kick returns. Bench “Goody” now and let Kastor take over before any more momentum is sucked out of this team with drive killing wide rights and lefts!
I would disagree somewhat with your assessment that our offense lacks a big play receiver. I think Clemons is our big play guy. He’s not an All-American first teamer, but he fits the bill as a guy who can give you big-play potential in the passing game.
if Clemons is our big play guy, we sure don't use him enough
I think that is more my point, if we got a guy, use him.
The Ralphie Report - Covering the Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
I Don't Get the Love Affair With Tyler Hansen .. .
. . . he’s been in the program 3+ years. He’s started a full season of games . . plus a few more. And he hasn’t won any more big games than Cody Hawkins.
The kid is simply not that good. He had CU inside the Mizzou 40 8 TIMES and couldn’t score a single point, much less a touchdown. If Cody’s last name was anything but Hawkins, nobody would have questioned jerking Hansen. He was not getting it done and refused to throw downfield.
“Uncalled for and inexcusable”? What game were you watching? Hansen was totally ineffective and looked like a deer in headlights. Cody isn’t the answer either, but to say Hansen didn’t deserve to get pulled means you care more about the last name of the back-up than the quality of the starter.
Sorry, TH is just not that good. He’s simply Cody Hawkins without Cody’s smarts . .. just better legs.
I agree
Hansen is probably not the end all be all answer at quarterback, but I am pretty sure Hawkins isn’t either. But I do know we probably don’t beat Georgia without Hansen’s ability to move around and run for first downs. He adds another dimension that Hawkins doesn’t and the coaching staff didn’t use that last night.
Certainly not in love with Hansen.
The Ralphie Report - Covering the Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
This is where I would love to install a Clark Evans zone read
oh crud…
I make reckless conclusions based on subjective data. (co-opted from Ash)
by Phil Fraser on Oct 10, 2010 11:29 AM MDT up reply actions
I think my big point is what do we gain from inserting Hawkins in there at that time
“it was uncalled for and inexcusable from my perspective”
was probably too harsh on my part
The Ralphie Report - Covering the Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
I Hear You. I Cringed Too. But a Lot of Coaches Would Have Pulled Hansen . . .
. . . if not most of them. Somehow, we have been hypnotized into the notion that TH is far and away clearly superior to Cody. He’s not. The coaches were BEGGING Hansen to put a stranglehold on the QB job for a year. They loved his legs and bigger body over Cody. But he couldn’t do it -the reports were accurate. The competition was close. Cody has a better knowledge of the playbook, but Tyler has better physical skills. So Tyler wins the job because he’s better at running for his life.
The guy has a hail mary situation with no time left . . .and throws underneath to McNight. Gimme a break. That’s just dumb.
But Hansen has zero field vision. The guy buys time with his legs . . .and throws shot puts to running backs on the sideline. And misses them.
I’m not bagging on Hansen. He’s a good athlete. But he’s not a better QB than Cody. And Cody’s isn’t very good either.
The biggest problem is a coaching staff that is functionally incapable of motivating some very good athletes to play competently on the road. Not well. Just competently.
by HiRanchBuff on Oct 10, 2010 12:38 PM MDT up reply actions
"Totally ineffective"
15-21 isn’t what i’d call ineffective. Sure maybe he should have tried for the deep ball a few more times but yanking your starting QB midway through the 5th game of the season in favor of your failed backup??? What do you think that does to the locker room. Hansen can’t be happy which makes players start to take sides. Had he brought in Hirschman (No i don’t think his red shirt should be burnt this season) that would have been another thing.
Player personnel isn’t our only problem. The line had some problems giving Hansen time, Hansen looked for the short route first quiet a bit and our receivers could have ran crisper routes.
My biggest problem with the QB change was the lack of stability we have had at the position under Hawkins. Cody wasn’t going to take the offense on his shoulders and lead us to victory. So why deliver a blow to our team moral?
What I don’t understand is how Hawkins is so back and forth about his QB’s but he moves Clark Evans to TE (which played a roll in him leaving) and moves Josh Moten to CB. I’m not saying either are the savior but if you’re gonna flip flop between 2 QB’s why not give one of the other capable players on the team a shot?
ps Missouri was a ranked opponent. For all of you that saw this as a game we should have won on the road are way off base. We are TERRIBLE on the road and to think we could get back on track against them is ridiculous.
"C-O-L-O-R-A-D-O"
"No Rebounds, No Rings"
"Things turn out best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out"
-John Wooden
Concur
I think a lot of Buff Nation has just transfered their feelings for Dan Hawkins and applied them to Cody. I mean it’s not as if we are pulling Peyton Manning out there in favor of Curtis Painter…They offer different things. Cody probably a better understanding of the offense and accuracy, Hansen better arm, escapability, playmaking and tall enough to ride on Splash Mountain at Disneyland.
In regard to Saturday night’s game, I don’t really fault Dan that much for the change. Whether that was the right time or not… I dunno. Probably was a little too early imo, but Hansen was not being effective. Sure the O-line was a sieve….again and he was running for his life, but one of the things I liked about Hansen was pulling the ball down and picking up some yards. His first year that’s all he did, last year there was a better mix, this year it’s as if he’s afraid to run. Whatever the reason, he needed to make quicker decisions and get rid of the ball quicker on Saturday, that wasn’t happening.
I also think it’s silly to say that Dan has given up on the team and doesn’t care about winning or losing. I think he did what he thought was right. But…that’s been the problem all along hasn’t it?
Here's what it boils down to
We suck at the single most important position in football: QB. We have a huge, talented (maybe a bit overrated) o-line, good WRs, a good RB in Stewart. So what’s the problem? We can’t recruit at QB. We might have one of the worst starting QBs in both the Big 12 and Pac 10 (12). CU simply won’t breakthrough until they get a real QB.
As for making the most of what we’ve got, I think Hansen is the slightly better option because of his mobility. But neither Cody or Tyler can get you where you want to go.
Another wasted year of football...
How much more proof do we need, Hawk cannot coach. Every year it is the same story, some worse than others, but every year is the same. This team has no heart, fire, ambition, desire, toughness, pride, etc. It has taken its’ identity from its’ head coach and the longer this goes on the longer it will take to get over. How come no one can see that we are just spinning our wheels, sitting in limbo with a leader that needs to be shown the door. This would not happen at a school that knows how to win football games. I’m afraid the glory days of CU football are over, sure we can be mediocre and have a big season once in awhile but there is not enough support at this broke school to climb out of this hole. Reality is we are looking up to schools like kansas and misery, we have fallen so far that without a huge influx of money (Knight, Pickens) we can’t afford a good coach or facilities to attract the kind of athlete and coach to compete with the haves. I cannot support this team with the coach any more. Wake me up when this is over.

by 












