Thoughts on the Buffaloes Scrimmage
Both Irish and I are going to pretty hard pressed to make much of fall practice this season. Luckily BuffFiend87 was there taking in the action and was kind enough (thank you!) to send over some observations. Remember, if any of you go to some practices/scrimmages make sure and throw your thoughts into a fanpost and we will do our best to promote the work to the front page.
They're definetely the "weak link" on defense but there's a lot of promise. Herrod is big and fast. Goree is huge. Kasa (pronounced Kay-suh I learned today so say it correctly so you don't get made of by your friends like me) and Bonsu (ed. note - Allen representing) looked good. Kasa is enormous along with Miller and Solder as the biggest looking players out there. I think Kasa will get a lot of PT this year and should start by next year at the latest.
They look solid. It was hard to gauge though because the offense isn't capable of many pass attempts down the field so it's hard to know how they will fare against pass happy spread teams. but they're big, fast and seem organized. The young guys (Mahnke, Orms, etc.) look like they're full of potential.
Finally, Will Jefferson actually got some PT and made a couple of catches today. He looks pretty good out there for being so new to the program. Dustin Ebner and Espinoza got a lot of PT with the first team offense. I don't know who #33 is (maybe a FB?) but he kind of reminded me of Brandon Drumm - big, bruising blocker with nice hands out of the backfield.
0 recs |
26 comments
|
Comments
Thanks BuffFiend
Tell me, you say the running backs and o-line looked good yet I read elsewhere the offense was only able to score 1 TD the whole scrimmage and Hansen was the leading rusher for the game. Was the o-line creating holes for the runners? I was figuring the RBs would put up good numbers and the offense would be able to move the ball with our (supposedly) strong o-line and the (supposedly) weak d-line. Like you I worry about the lack of TE production. They were invisible last year and we need Geer and Deveney to have big years if our passing game is going to be effective. Anyway, thanks again.
by nebraskasux on Aug 13, 2009 9:09 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
hmmm
Pretty disappointing to hear about the passing game and I have to agree on the tight ends. Would really love to see them get more involved with the offense. I’m not sure how long I’ll be able to put up with the uber conservative passing game. If you don’t occasionally stretch the field,or atleast try to the offense is just going to be as predictable as it has been in years past and the defense will just constantly play the run. I really hoped with our stable of running backs that we could line up and do some creative things. Hope we can run over everyone because it sounds like we are going to have to.
On the other hand props to the defensive backs and linebackers. Sounds like they really did one hell of a job which will come in especially helpful in our pass happy Big 12. What are everyone’s expectations for Kasa’s playing time? Seems like he has a big enough frame that he should be backing up this season and concentrating on putting on a little weight.
Appreciate the report, wish I could have made it up there.
by NYCskibum on Aug 13, 2009 9:16 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
went back and read the report on cubuffs
Looks like they intentionally kept the offense very vanilla so not to give the spies anything to take back to fort collins, lawrence, Austin etc etc.
Think its pretty lame. If you can execute properly then it doesn’t matter if the defense has an idea of what your offense is capable of.
by NYCskibum on Aug 13, 2009 9:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Bufffiend...really appreciate it
definitely sounds like the practice was very situational and very vanilla…
from the DP:
For the only scrimmage of August drills that will be open to the public, the offense wasn’t about to show any trick plays or new formations. Junior quarterback Cody Hawkins called the offense “vanilla.”
“A lot of our offense is installed, but we maybe ran 5 percent of it,” Cody Hawkins said. “We didn’t do anything today. We didn’t do any of what we’ve been doing in practice. We have a lot of stuff we didn’t want to show anybody else.”
The Ralphie Report - Go Buffs!...All Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Aug 13, 2009 9:31 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Does it scare anyone else
that we were running our plain vanilla offense and couldn’t do that crisply? The more and more I read the more freaked out I get about this coming season.
Our QB situation continues to scare the living daylights out of me. If defenses can sit 15 yards back and play everything in front of them it won’t matter how good our RB’s are.
by Buff-in-IL on Aug 14, 2009 9:10 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
um, #33 is Patrick Devenney
glad to hear that he’s practicing at FB. He’s a QB converted to TE converted to whatever he is now.
by Hallux Valgus on Aug 13, 2009 9:39 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Little different take on scrimmage.
I thought Goodman looked much improved. He was 10-14 with one of his misses coming from 57. Hit the upright from 48 but never had a kick shorter than 30 and had 6 over 42 yards.
I don’t want to nitpick here, rather give the readers a more objective view of scrimmage. I found it hard to assess any of the running backs. We didn’t run much. Scott looked okay, not “great,” Speedy certainly didn’t look “great”, he touched the ball twice for no substantial gains and left scrimmage with hurt hammy. I thought Lockridge looked the best of the bunch. He’ll make some plays for us somehow someway. He had a real nice koff return. Sumler had the best run of the day..probably 30 yards..started left, they turned back right for big gain.
I was very impressed with Hansen. Sure he had some big runs but I thought his patience in the pocket was much improved. I thought he used his feet to buy time for the passing game first rather than just tuck and run. He was 10-15 for 135 and rushed for 57 yards. He averaged 9 yds per pass attempt while Cody averaged 6.3(21-29-185). Personally, I’d still feel better with Cody starting right now but I’d say Hansen has closed the gap considerably and his play was probably the hilite of the scrimmage.
Again, my one wish is they would have run the ball more. It was hard to get real excited about the oline because they really never had much of an opportunity to get the run game going. The scrimmage seemed to focus on passing.
I do agree, Evans won’t figure in the mix this year and Darden and Ussery probably won’t either. Jefferson is getting more looks than those two which is surprising. Also, Simmons was there, in shorts and tank top I guess he’s still waiting. I actually called the Independence Community College Registar’s office and left a message. Basically asked if they had sent his transcripts or not.
Defense was hard to judge, Jimmy Smith started with the 2nd team. It looks like right now Cha’pelle Brown and Ben Burney are your first team corners. Rippy was also running with 2nd team although there was some moving around.
Kasa looked good. Late in scrimmage when it looked like the 3rd teams going against each other, Kasa was iso’d on Jack Harris. Kasa pushed him back and kinda of abused him. Fun to watch. I think Kasa will get some p-t this year.
by ebuff on Aug 13, 2009 9:57 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Interesting...
Smith running 2nd team huh…? Is Burney looking that good or is Smith not producing?
The Ralphie Report - University of Colorado Athletics
by Jon Woods on Aug 13, 2009 10:23 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions 0 recs
Duh....
First scrimmage D should be ahead of the O. Open scrimmage: Kiesau isn’t going to tip ANYTHING!
Anybody who’s “disappointed we looked like last year” should pull their head out of their a**! That was the plan! With an open scrimmage, MAYBE there was a scout or two from, oh…I dunno… FT Fun? Toledo?? WYO??? all taking notes. And right now Fairchild and Christiansen have reports identical to what we all have: CU same as last year, short passes, weak running attack, D line suspect….Gee willikers, Sandy… wotta soo-prise! Cody even admitted they ran only 5% of the offense.
by Cholo on Aug 13, 2009 10:23 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
of course we all hope you're right
but we also aren’t stupid and you don’t need to talk to us like we are. We all know CU doesn’t open up their playbook during the spring game and fall scrimmages. No other programs do either, but when you read about other top programs and their scrimmages you more often than not hear about solid offensive production. Let’s see, last year our offense looked anemic in the scrimmages, and to quote you “wotta soo-prise!” it was anemic all season long.
by nebraskasux on Aug 13, 2009 10:52 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Also there...
& agree with a lot is stated here wrt to Hansen from the last poster. I thought Hansen looked shaky early and clearly needs to be quicker making decisions. he won’t have the same time back there against the likes of UT that he had yesterday. However, our o-line are beasts and I think they will provide ample protection to whomever is behind center. Expect lots of blitzes from opposing D’s to get to the QB on passing plays this year. My take on Hansen was that although he maybe took awhile to get going, when he settled down, he looked good back there. Cody was obviously more comfortable from the start. However, it seemed to be very similar to last year. I really hope Hansen’s confidence and knowledge of the O continues to improve in practice and we go with him from week one.
Scott looked like the Scott of last year, honestly. Some glimpses of greatness, but he seems to have a bit of heistancy. Speedy looked great until he went to the sideline. Sumler looked fantastic and Lockridge solid.
Defensively, I thought the backers were awesome, as expected, and the D-line was nonexistant. However, I left a little more than halfway through the scrimmage, so I was unable to see the improvement towards the end that is described above. FGs were a huge improvement and elicited the largest applause from the crowd when Goodman made his first kick. Overall, we’ll be much improved on FGs if we kick like we did yesterday. I didn’t take too much stock in the punts and kickoffs – it appears that there was a lot of holding going on, and that stuff can get worked out quickly.
Finally, WRs need to really foces on getting better. That should help the QB.
by BuffulanceMan on Aug 14, 2009 7:10 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Follow up to posting
Great to hear everyone’s thoughts and get some new perspectives! My friends and I missed Simmons on the sideline and couldn’t see him, so glad to hear he was there. I thought the first team oline did a good job of opening up holes for the RBs, not so much the second team and yes they probably could’ve run the ball more, particularly in the second half of the scrimmage. I thought Scott made the big run but it was Sumler so he’s looking better than I remembered. Maybe I just desperately want Scott to be awesome and saw what I wanted to see. I can buy the vanilla offense (makes sense) and pray that things are looking good at closed practices with the secret plays. Maybe I didn’t emphasize it enough, Hansen is tremendously improved and definetely has a better feel for the passing game. I just think he still looks a little too much like last year, i.e. very quick progressions and then run if nothing is immediately open but I really think he could be one of the best Big 12 QBs by the end of his career at CU. Cody just looked more polished than Hansen to us. I agree that Goodman looked a little better particuarly as the practice went on and they definetely gave him numerous opportunities. All of us thought the FG blocking and snap handling can get better which may improve Goodman’s kicking. We’re all spoiled though because we went to CU during the Mason Crosby era so our expectations may be too high.
by BuffFiend87 on Aug 14, 2009 9:23 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
O-line question
Who started at Left Guard yesterday?
by COSBUFF on Aug 14, 2009 11:30 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Relax
Yes from all reports it sounded a little boring yesterday, but lets remember this was less than 1 week into fall practice, 3 more to go. I wouldn’t expect to see great execution or lots of complex offensive schemes. Remembering my first week as a freshmen at CU, I was lucky to find the cafeteria, so I’m sure our newcomers have their head spinning right now. I’m just glad no injuries.
I’m much more concerned about Simmons getting on the field. Something doesn’t smell right.
by BuffnBigD on Aug 14, 2009 2:57 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
from CUbuffs.com- "CU not having the transcript from his junior college is not the issue keeping Simmons sidelined"
http://www.cubuffs.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=600&ATCLID=204775270
Oh lord… it suddenly looks very possible that Simmons won’t be on the field this season.
by nebraskasux on Aug 14, 2009 11:14 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seriously, can I just drive there and pick it up?
The Ralphie Report - University of Colorado Athletics
by Jon Woods on Aug 15, 2009 12:48 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
well, that's the thing
based on that article that’s not even the issue after all, right? If it was just them needing to send or fax us some piece of paper don’t you think it would of been done by now? I’m sure the athletic department would of sent some staffer to camp out in a tent outside their records office if it would of helped at all. Unfortunately I think there is more to it than that, as soon as there are official CU articles talking about the possibility of him redshirting I think we can assume there are major problems.
by nebraskasux on Aug 15, 2009 1:13 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks
To everyone who went to the scrimmage and posted – love the insight and thoughts- it’s still early so we’ll see what happens.
And to the guy who called the JC about WR Simmon’s eligibility, well done! That is hilarious and I’d love to hear if you got a call back, I’m guessing no.
by CleBUFFS on Aug 14, 2009 5:01 PM MDT via mobile reply actions 0 recs
there are some photos posted on Hawk's facebook page
BAM:
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=134022&id=512022993
Jason Espinoza looks jacked.
by Hallux Valgus on Aug 14, 2009 6:01 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
and Jesus, Nick Kasa is a monster
I’ve stood next to Clark Evans, and he’s a big dude. But next to Kasa, Evans looks like a toddler.
by Hallux Valgus on Aug 14, 2009 6:06 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
kicking/punting
Awww, you knew I’d chime in eventually.
Kickers/Punters
Inconsistency is the word. I’m confident that Goodman can make 3/4 of kicks from 40 yards or less. Beyond that I’m thinking 1/3 or so. DiLallo didn’t look great at P. Grossnickle was played a lot at P and struggled but he showed some potential at K. I’m not sure he’s a better option than Goodman right now. The other kicker (James Davis?) only kicked off a couple of times. Not great protection during FG attempts but solid kick return coverage.
I sat near some people who knew Grossnickle, so here’s a little more info, since we were watching the special teams guys closely. First, DiLallo took the majority of punts, and he looked better than the GNickle did. GNickle has a busted arm and can’t catch snaps for another few weeks. The couple punts he attempted weren’t that impressive. Heard he did better in practice when he didn’t have to rush to get off the punt, but he’s having trouble catching the ball with the cast covering his hand and wrist. Most people couldn’t tell he had a cast on his arm since it was black and so was his jersey. I think he had either 3 or 4 punts total. The jury is out until he’s healthy and can handle a snap with both hands.
Goodman did nearly all of the field goals that were attempted. He did clang into the uprights twice: one was good, one wasn’t. … What are the odds of hitting a pole that is 5" in diameter? Is there some kind of record he can break doing this? … But he made a number of long FGs and only missed a few. From the official CU site: Goodman made 10-of-14 field goal attempts.
Ryan Aweida, one of the new walk-on kickers (a junior transfer), attempted his first two FGs in a buff uniform, he missed the first one and made the second. Since he’s only played soccer before, having a line facing him must have been interesting to say the least.
True freshman Grossnickle was sent in to kick just one FG – not particularly long – 30 or 35 yds, and he made it straight through the middle of the uprights. Nothing spectacular, not particularly high, but it does leave his stats at a perfect 100%.
Jameson Davis, (#38) who is still rehabbing a knee after surgery, kicked off exactly once, and it was a strong solid kick. If they are just holding him out so he’s 100% healthy for the Rams game, good for the coaches. The rest of the KOs were handled by Goodman and he looked good. There weren’t a lot of KOs overall, but I remember a coupled going into the endzone, at least 4 yds deep.
(I thought the other walk-on kicker, Justin Mihalcin, did not play in the scrimmage but either he or Jameson Davis did have one KO. I thought it was Davis, but I will say I’ve read more than one person who thought it was #30 Mihalcin. Probably hard to read 38 vs. 30 from across the field, but I think it was Davis who kicked. Since either way, it was only one kick, it doesn’t matter too much, but I’d like to think that Davis is healing up and took the ko.)
by JustmyOp on Aug 14, 2009 8:30 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Running backs
Running Backs
Scott looks awesome. He nearly got killed trying to hurdle over a LB and fumbled the ball. I don’t know if the hurdle is quite as easy in college. Stewart looked good but then he looked like he hurt his hamstring and was slow for awhile before retiring to the bench. Sumler looks good and may be faster than last year. Lockridge is extremely fast and looks healthy. He should be good catching balls out of the backfield. The walk on from Denver east showed some promise and got a lot of PT.
Quentin Hildreth, #28. He looked pretty good for a freshman.
by JustmyOp on Aug 14, 2009 8:34 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
never got call back from Indepenence C.C.
by ebuff on Aug 14, 2009 11:42 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Calling Simmons Previous School = don't!
I can only hope you are joking, but this is from Brooks release on Simmons’ status:
Livingston said Independence’s administrative offices had received numerous messages from anxious Buffs fans, wanting the process to be speeded up and resolved.
“We appreciate our fans caring about Andre and wanting to help, but contacting the junior college directly is certainly not helping anyone,” Livingston said.
by JustmyOp on Aug 15, 2009 6:23 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 










