Biggest Postion Battles Going Into Spring Ball: Part Two
As a follow up to our first part discussion about the biggest spring position battles, part two will talk about the spring/fall/season battle that will lead most conversations when talking about the 2009 Buffs: QB. Nothing will be more talked about this offseason than the competition between Hawkins, Hansen and Ballenger for the starting spot.
1) Starting Quarterback - Tyler Hansen, Cody Hawkins, Matt Ballenger
Get ready for the first of many debates about the quarterback position. Boy, has it been a while since we could come into the season confident about our signal caller. Right now, the topic is unsettling. None of the three above make you feel really good about the position in '09. Each has displayed traits to get fans optimistic but each has shown more than their fair share of inadequacies. The good news for Buff fans is that Cody Hawkins or Tyler Hansen's playing time consisted of lining up behind a banged up offensive line with inexperienced running backs and less than explosive wide outs. Hawkins along with the other two QB's will benefit greatly from another offseason of learning, an offensive scheme that plays towards the team's strengths (unlike last year's spread offense disaster), a healthy and more
experienced group of linemen and a couple new playmakers at wideout.
One thing is for sure, I believe more than ever, this year's competition is as wide open as possible. I wrote a breakdown of each player after the jump but it sounds so similar to what we have been saying for a year that if you want to read it, go ahead. Before that, though, I thought I would put things we should watch for this spring regarding the progression of each quarterback.
Cody Hawkins - it is not the spring practice results we want to see, it is the game day success. The reason Hawkins has been the starter for two years is his ability to show leadership and knowledge of the playbook in practice over the other options. Unfortunately, I think we know what we get in Cody Hawkins and I think it is fair to say, his growth is much more dependent on the maturation of others around him, not necessarily things he can work on day in and day out. If this team is healthy around him, he may be the most knowledgeable and stable option the Buffs have at quarterback to run the ship. If their is anything we need to see from Hawkins is his ability to finish plays and make plays out of nothing. This offense lacked any real playmaking ability out of their quarterbacks last year.
Tyler Hansen - Hansen is probably the quarterback with the most to gain this spring. He will be like a freshman all over again, learning the playbook, gaining the trust of the coaching staff and teammates, etc. Luckily, he does have some experience from last year in all of those categories. What Hansen needs to build upon is the cerebral part of the game. If we see Hansen making audibles at the line, making all the throws, going through progression-based bootlegs, then we can say his camp was successful. Like all quarterbacks, Hansen will be learning a new offense that will challenge his comfort level. When I go to the practices and scrimmages, the main thing I will be watching for is Hansen's poise and confidence in the pocket. If he stands in their, delivers the ball promptly to receivers, doesn't vacate the pocket quickly (happy feet), then we are looking at the emergence of a confident, well-studied quarterback.
Matt Ballenger - like Hansen, Ballenger has a ton to gain this offseason. Hansen and Ballenger will be the flavor of choice for the fans and maybe even the coaching staff. This offense needs a jump start in the all important fourth year for Dan Hawkins and he may look to the sophomores for the spark. Ballenger has a more unknown task to fans. We really don't know much about him other than he is a bigger quarterback (6'4" 225 pounds), has decent mobility and a good arm. Much has been made of Ballenger's assertiveness and "too nice of a guy" approach so far. It will be important for Ballenger to start to display more leadership this spring and start to command the offense, not just go through the motions. Other than that, Ballenger's confidence and pocket presence will also be worth watching this spring. Like Hansen, he is still young and has a lot to learn about the college game.
For more thoughts, read after the jump...
Here is something we talked about a month ago (I made a few adjustments):
Now on to the meat. I believe Cody's development was stunted by the injuries and the youth of this team but I also think/know that Cody is limited. Nothing new by that statement.
Defining the qualities of each guy, Hansen and Ballenger both have measurables that Cody doesn't necessarily have and Hawkins has leadership qualities and is a gamer that we have yet to see from the other two.
QB Qualities:
Hansen - has the ability to run, adds a dimension, has a good arm that was shown in practice but wasn't confident enough to let it rip because he was young and had his hands tied when it came to having a full playbook at his disposal. he wasn't ready last year and didn't have enough practice to understand the progressions, the reads and the defense he was going against. The good thing is now Hansen will get his reps with the first team and will now be fully emerged in the playbook. That makes me very optimistic because the one thing holding him back was confidence in his domain at quarterback. Their is nothing more intimidating than playing quarterback with a limited set of plays, a lack of knowledge regarding defensive schemes, not having a feel for the college game. He does have good spin on the ball. He needs to continue to physically mature to go with his mental maturation. Bottom line with both Ballenger and Hansen is both are light year's behind Hawkins in knowledge, leadership and experience. The good thing is both are probably light years ahead of Hawkins in terms of physical characteristics. Bottom line, he has talent but he was a freshman last year. The learning curve will need to be big this offseason. Their is still a ton for us to find out about him.
Hawkins - undoubtedly, the leader of this team. I still think he has decent arm strength but his size gets balls batted down at the line and most importantly, he struggles to find throwing lanes. Again, I think it is unfair to totally place the blame on Hawkins last year considering all the injuries but we have yet to see a ton of playmaking ability from him. We need the potential touchdowns completed against FSU even though he is getting pressured. We need Hawkins to be able to make something happen when the protection breaks down, we need playmaking at the quarterback position...period. The Buffs offense needs the tight end and part of their decline in production is due to Cody not being able to see the entire field. His ability to throw sideline to sideline is a question mark. He had good games against only Iowa State and CSU this year with turnovers and short drives too often plaguing this team. Cody will always leave more to be desired as he isn't flashy but I still want to give him a shot behind a healthy line and some more playmakers this spring and fall. He has other intangibles that aren't necessarily measured by stats but at some point in time, the intangibles need to convert to not having a bottom tiered offense in the Big 12 and wins.
Ballenger - kind of the unknown in this whole process even though a recent article in the Boulder Daily Camera game us some insight into what he needs to improve on to become the Buffs quarterback. Basically, Ballenger needs a fire, a drive from within, a spark. What both Hansen and to a greater degree, Ballenger, has not shown the coaching staff is their ability to lead this team. He has great measurables with good size and height. I would say his arm strength is on par with Hansen. He does have some mobility, certainly more than Hawkins. Like Hansen, he just needs to bring it all together.
The Ralphie Report Prediction: I think I speak for most Buff fans in that we would like Tyler Hansen or Matt Ballenger totake control of the position to see what he brings to the table. Either way, though, we want someone to take the position, not just assume it. We have seen Cody and we like Cody a lot as a person and he will be a great coach one day but we have seen that show. If Cody wins the battle, so be it... we just have to hope experience, playmakers and health provide better results.
0 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
Maybe a long shot, but what about Clark Evans
I realize he is not able to compete in Spring Ball, but what are the thoughts of him pulling a (cough, cough, gag) Tim Teabow and starting as a true freshman?
"Me fail english, that unpossible" - Ralph Wiggum
"Duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem" - Duffman
"McDaniels must go!" - Broncoman
by Broncoman on Mar 26, 2009 12:00 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I am definitely excited to see Evans come fall, would have made a world of
difference if he early enrolled. Hawkins would have to have major balls to put Evans out there this year when he needs a winning season. But if Evans is the best man for the job, by all means, play him
The Ralphie Report - Go Buffs!...All Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Mar 26, 2009 12:25 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tebow didn't start as a true freshman. Chris Leak did
I’ve spoken of this often. Tebow was basically a short yardage fullback.
by Hallux Valgus on Mar 26, 2009 1:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Things haven't changed much.
Except now he starts!
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Mar 27, 2009 6:25 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Or a cough, cough, gag Robert Griffin
It all depends on the player, but until someone slams the door shut on starting, it is anyone’s job
by DABUFFS50 on Mar 26, 2009 12:14 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Nice piece on the biggest Spring camp issue
You nailed the Cody assessment. We’ve seen his show, although without some of the new weapons we have available this year. He has demonstrated his strengths and limitations. We need to go in a different direction for this program to REALLY succeed.
There are some folks hyped about Bally but I don’t see it. He’s been in the system going on 3 years and hasn’t shown the ability to LEAD this team. If he hasn’t taken over by now, when will he? The gig has been open for him, especially last year.
Evans has talent and moxy! Still is asking a LOT to expect him to come in and LEAD the team from the get go. We all know about unrealistic/inflated expectations (see Scott, D.). Maybe a limited scheme of plays drawn up just for Evans, a la Tebow and, last year, Aaron Pryor at OSU, would work. But still seems better suited for a red-shirt. If we are starting Evans, kiss the “10 wins” goodbye.
That leaves Hansen, the man of the hour. If he put in the off-season work, he should have the confidence/comfort level to let his natural abilities take over. When that happens, he becomes the guy.
Go BUFFS! BTW, “10 wins” not likely but 8 or 9 is very doable!
by mam2jd on Mar 26, 2009 12:38 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't even care if Hawkins plays at all in the Spring
all I care about is Ballenger and Hansen. Spring ball is tough, because it’s hard to tell if one unit is really good, or if the other is just really bad. So every positive is usually also a negative. Not so with the backup QB’s, because they absolutely can demonstrate a knowledge of the playbook and ability to take command of the team without it being a reflection of the talent on the other side of the ball.
by Hallux Valgus on Mar 26, 2009 1:11 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
wait til summer ball
This race is wide open and like Ringo said, unless Ballenger or Hansen fall flat on their faces, it’s not going to be decided this spring.
by MDBuff on Mar 26, 2009 6:28 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I've stated my feelings on this many times so I won't rehash it again
That’s a very politically correct “prediction” irish :-) But who do you think will actually end up the starter?
by nebraskasux on Mar 26, 2009 7:23 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
this battle reminded me of something (someone) else I've worried about...
You know, the advice I’d give Ballenger isn’t that different than the advice I’d give Lynn Katoa:
You have a huge opportunity in front of you. There’s a million guys who will never get the chance you’ve got to do what you can do. Maybe you’re up to it, maybe you’re not…….But I’d tell you to put 100% into every practice, every opportunity, every scrimmage, even into every interview (yes, Matt, that’s directed at you coming off as Mr. Nice Guy instead of a dominating, forceful, powerful take-charge guy), because you DON’T want to look back and wonder what could have been. You want to look back on your career at CU and know you put heart, soul and entire physical being into this. Do not let this slip away and be the unwritten chapter of your life. Make something happen.
I really think Ballenger could be something special, but I don’t know if he’s going to realize it in time to take the reins. No more giggling when reporters ask a question, no more “I guess so” answers, no more letting us think he isn’t studying the playbook (whether he is or isn’t, that’s all I hear, so I’m starting to believe it.)
Do it, man, just do it.
by JustmyOp on Mar 26, 2009 7:39 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't know that that's really fair
If that’s his personality, that’s his personality. I think all athletes look back on their careers and wonder “what might have been.” Hell, I bet John Elway occasionally wonders what would have happened had he stuck with the Yankees.
I certainly don’t think that Cody is any sort of “dominating, forceful, powerful” personality. He sure doesn’t come across like that to me. He comes across as a guy with a fun, dynamic personality who has a significant command of the playbook (and I think that’s underrated about Cody- we’ve changed the offense on almost a weekly basis for two years now. That’s not what he grew up learning).
I haven’t seen much of Ballenger playing, but if he is to become the starter, I think it has less to do with how he responds to the media and fans, and more to do with how he acts collected in the huddle and displays a knowledge of the playbook.
Remember- Cody once answered a question about an interception with, “yeah, but did you see my sweet tackle?” I thought it was funny, but it could certainly be seen as a flippant, unserious answer if it wasn’t generally assumed that Cody was the leader of the offense.
by Hallux Valgus on Mar 26, 2009 7:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t know that that’s really fair … If that’s his personality, that’s his personality.
I haven’t seen much of Ballenger playing, but if he is to become the starter, I think it has less to do with how he responds to the media and fans, and more to do with how he acts collected in the huddle and displays a knowledge of the playbook.
I like Matt B. I have seen his interviews and that’s all. I’m obviously not a coach and won’t have any direct contact with him.
But if he wants to be taken seriously as a possible starter, my impression is he needs to take charge. He needs to act like he has confidence in himself. I think he HAS the skills and the size and the mobility. I think he doesn’t present himself as serious.
Of course I don’t know how he talks to coaches and other players, but if I could give Matty advice, it’s that: start acting like the staring QB 24/7. Don’t give a dopey interview to Ringo - if you are going to be interviewed, (or even surprised with an interview) think about what you want to say in advance, how you want to present yourself and be ready. Whether you are talking to a coach, or a reporter, BE READY! It’s like you know that someone in your company will be promoted this year, every single day you better come in acting like it could be you, talk the part, walk the part. Otherwise they’ll forget all about you.
fair enough?
by JustmyOp on Mar 27, 2009 5:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
and a question:
What the heck is going on in that photo of Hawkins? Is that Cody? Are they dancing? Fixing the helmet?
I keep looking and don’t know what it is.
by JustmyOp on Mar 26, 2009 7:42 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
it's hansen
but who knows, simultanious chest bump, pat on the head, and hug?
by nebraskasux on Mar 26, 2009 7:59 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hansen went in for the double high five
Hawk went in for the hug…that is my thought. ended with a belly rub and an akward hansen
The Ralphie Report - Go Buffs!...All Colorado Buffaloes on SBNation - http://www.ralphiereport.com/
by irish1611 on Mar 26, 2009 9:02 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
QB competition a good thing
I’m not concerned with not having a starter named at this
point. In fact, I think it will help the team in the long
run by giving all the QBs in the race plenty of reps which
will go a long way to building depth. Injuries
happen(hopefully not) and we need more than one guy with the
skills to lead this team. A good QB compition that lasts
through the spring and fall will get the rest of the offense
used to working with different guys at the helm. It can
only help. The longer it draws out the more I feel we have
more than one guy who can handle the job.
by MDBuff on Mar 26, 2009 7:54 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
great poiunt mdbuff...
think it will help the team in the long run by giving all the QBs in the race plenty of reps which
will go a long way to building depth….
we need more than one guy with the skills to lead this team
Totally agree. All these polls about who will start: while I like continuity, I’d love it if we have three guys who are ready and capable.
I can stand the suspense, let them compete all the way until September.
by JustmyOp on Mar 27, 2009 5:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 












